Monday, 10 December 2012

Perinatal mortality

-->
Every morning we have a handover where the last 24 hrs statistics are reviewed for every ward and special cases discussed both as a learning point and also to help in patient management.  I am always surprised by the postnatal ward summary- it normally goes something like this:  on the postnatal ward we have 70 mothers 40 of whom have their babies with them.  My immediate thought is -what happened to the other 30 babies, they go on to say 15 babies are in the nursery/ nicu- and run threw the stats e.g 3 for birth asphyxia, 4 for prematurity etc. but there is still always a percentage unaccounted.  These are the babies that have died fresh still birth, macerated still birth and early neonatal deaths and its easy to see why these occur.
 It is too late to do anything about the macerated still births once they reach the hospital, the mum presents and already there is no fetal heartbeat detectable and hasn’t been for a few days, sometimes this is because of the distance the woman has to travel to reach the health facility by which point it is too late, but it is also due to poor patient education and the women not knowing to be vigilant for reduction or changes in fetal movements which could indicate problems and lack of attending for antenatal care so early problems aren’t detected and addressed . 
The bigger problem however and one that we can do something about are those babies who die within labour.  Imagine carrying your baby for 9 months coming to hospital, going through a long labour only to deliver a stillborn baby and be told that your baby has died- it must be heartbreaking!   The guidelines are that the fetal heart should be listened to every 30 minutes in the first stage of labour and every 15 minutes in the second stage of labour- this is often not feasible with the large patient load and staff shortages and sometimes the fetal heart is only listened to once or twice in labour, and so fetal distress is missed and poor outcomes common! 
If anyone has any suggestions as to how to improve this with limited resources please comment below.  I have been using the student to help, which has worked a little but they aren’t always around.  I also bought a CTG machine with me which I thought could be used for high risk patients after some training and excitedly tried to use it once but came to plug it in only to realise the sockets were broken and didn’t work. I also need to think of ways to motivate the midwives as i'm sure more can be done within the same system, it must be difficult when you are over worked and payed so little and poor outcomes are so common to not get complacent and just take it as the status quo especially as there are almost no repercussions. 
Malawi is actually doing quite well at reducing its child mortality rates but   neonatal mortality still makes up 32% of the under 5 deaths and may hinder in achieving the millennium development goals.   A high Perinatal death rate is actually an indicator for poor obstetric care within a country and this is clearly seen here. 

5 comments:

  1. Thanks for your Blog Soha and all your insights.

    I remember this was such as issue when I was there too. When the longterm implications of intrapartum asphyxia are seen on the neonatal unit every day then the importance of improving the monitoring during labour is really brought home.

    Your question what are the solutions is a challenge.

    Frank and Bonus had suggested having individuals on labour ward specifically tasked to ensure intermittent fetal monitoring was carried out, recognisisng that the midwives currently do not have the time to also do this consistently. Has this been tried?

    I think this needs to be coupled with a shift to acknowledging the importance of fetal monitoring. Perhaps this will be ultimately driven by more empowered patients and communities demanding this of their health providers.

    My thoughts are that CTG is not a viable solution. Without recourse to an fetal scalp sample, careful structured training and staffing to observe the monitors reliably I fear that we would be forced into greatly over interviening, or interviening in the wrong cases, which would push resources and mean that those that really needed delivery were in fact delayed by unnecessary cases. The evidence for CTG use is as you know scanty in a developed world setting, perhaps we need to look systematically at the evidence for interventions to improve monitoring (i.e behavioural etc..) alongside the evidence for which interventions work in this setting to improve outcomes. There may be work we don't know about that is relevant.

    I will feedback to Ammalife as perhaps there is a case for a systematic review on this important topic - do you want to be involved?

    Best wishes,

    David

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks David, no it has not been tried yet, but its interesting you should say that because i was thinking the same thing a bit like the maternity support workers in the uk- but who would these staff be- and given that they are cutting the number of midwifes down im guessing due to funding who would fund them.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Soha,
    silly question but if fetal monitoring isn't normally checked with a CTG machine in the hospital how is it done? Is it with a doppler? if so, maybe giving it to the mum to check would be a thought? nobody would be more keen on ensuring their child's safety then the parent them self.. considering you can get dopplers on Amazon and the likes, it shouldn't be too difficult to educate the parent, no?

    Rayan

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey Ray,

    They use pinnards, dopplers would be too expensive to have enough of for everyone. i did think of this too, well not the patient but their guardian- however the population is generally un-educated and fetal hearts are fiddly to find even in experienced hands and even harder to interpret!

    ReplyDelete
  5. keep the suggestions coming peeps- always interesting to read- and hey maybe together we'll figure it out :)

    ReplyDelete